<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Druvaa inSync v3.0 Feature List</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.druva.com/2008/12/22/druvaa-insync-v30-feature-list/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.druva.com/2008/12/22/druvaa-insync-v30-feature-list/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=druvaa-insync-v30-feature-list</link>
	<description>Enterprise Data Backup and Beyond</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 May 2011 12:12:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Druvaa inSync v3.0 Feature List - Storage Informer</title>
		<link>http://blog.druva.com/2008/12/22/druvaa-insync-v30-feature-list/#comment-278</link>
		<dc:creator>Druvaa inSync v3.0 Feature List - Storage Informer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 17:54:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.druvaa.com/?p=73#comment-278</guid>
		<description>[...] Druvaa inSync v3.0 Feature List [...] </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Druvaa inSync v3.0 Feature List [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carlos</title>
		<link>http://blog.druva.com/2008/12/22/druvaa-insync-v30-feature-list/#comment-277</link>
		<dc:creator>Carlos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 15:56:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.druvaa.com/?p=73#comment-277</guid>
		<description>Tony,

you seem to be an expert on usability and HMI.
Very Impressive :)

We would work on this and see how much of this can we take care of in v3

Thanks,
Carlos (PM, Druvaa)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tony,</p>
<p>you seem to be an expert on usability and HMI.<br />
Very Impressive <img src='http://blog.druva.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>We would work on this and see how much of this can we take care of in v3</p>
<p>Thanks,<br />
Carlos (PM, Druvaa)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony</title>
		<link>http://blog.druva.com/2008/12/22/druvaa-insync-v30-feature-list/#comment-276</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 21:06:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.druvaa.com/?p=73#comment-276</guid>
		<description>&quot;&quot;Usability is the key to success &quot;&quot;


On the restore window,


1. No end user help (need a help button that quickly shows end user how to restore their own file/folder).  We are open 24/7 in 28 country’s, I don’t want them calling me :)


2. Default restore location is bad, it’s going to the user folder, which most have no idea how to get their form Explorer .  My suggestion, Default should be User Desktop  inSync Restore (todays date). 

 
3. Also no option to restore to original location, this could be good or bad.

4. Also you can put one line under the buttons as their description

But overall I liked SIS .. it backs up lighting fast.

- T</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;&#8221;Usability is the key to success &#8220;&#8221;</p>
<p>On the restore window,</p>
<p>1. No end user help (need a help button that quickly shows end user how to restore their own file/folder).  We are open 24/7 in 28 country’s, I don’t want them calling me <img src='http://blog.druva.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>2. Default restore location is bad, it’s going to the user folder, which most have no idea how to get their form Explorer .  My suggestion, Default should be User Desktop  inSync Restore (todays date). </p>
<p>3. Also no option to restore to original location, this could be good or bad.</p>
<p>4. Also you can put one line under the buttons as their description</p>
<p>But overall I liked SIS .. it backs up lighting fast.</p>
<p>- T</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony</title>
		<link>http://blog.druva.com/2008/12/22/druvaa-insync-v30-feature-list/#comment-275</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 20:08:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.druvaa.com/?p=73#comment-275</guid>
		<description>Some usability suggestions -

1. The server GUI does not give a very good on-gui help for storage and profile creation. 

  The user should be guided towards SIS store, when thats your key selling feature

2. The server GUI looks like Windows 3.1 age, needs face-lift. The client GUI is good.

3. Sync Now without the key shows &quot;No server configured&quot;. Your software is smart enough to realize nothing was configured.  So give me a button to go the configure screen.

4. Now that I think of it, if there is no Key loaded (not configured), Why not go directly to the Conf. Screen.

 AND for that matter why not show just load key menu in the configuration menu. Anyways you can configure anything without loading the key.

5. Just have the end user prompt to load the KEY, the conf screen has some stuff on there we do not want them to do.

- T</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some usability suggestions -</p>
<p>1. The server GUI does not give a very good on-gui help for storage and profile creation. </p>
<p>  The user should be guided towards SIS store, when thats your key selling feature</p>
<p>2. The server GUI looks like Windows 3.1 age, needs face-lift. The client GUI is good.</p>
<p>3. Sync Now without the key shows &#8220;No server configured&#8221;. Your software is smart enough to realize nothing was configured.  So give me a button to go the configure screen.</p>
<p>4. Now that I think of it, if there is no Key loaded (not configured), Why not go directly to the Conf. Screen.</p>
<p> AND for that matter why not show just load key menu in the configuration menu. Anyways you can configure anything without loading the key.</p>
<p>5. Just have the end user prompt to load the KEY, the conf screen has some stuff on there we do not want them to do.</p>
<p>- T</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: paulg</title>
		<link>http://blog.druva.com/2008/12/22/druvaa-insync-v30-feature-list/#comment-274</link>
		<dc:creator>paulg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 06:44:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.druvaa.com/?p=73#comment-274</guid>
		<description>Good point Borja. A good use case for data deduplication is higher retention and a time-period based retention of data and configuration would be good.

Any plans for a tape support. You currently have a very basic support for tape. Or, you would only be concentrating on D2D ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good point Borja. A good use case for data deduplication is higher retention and a time-period based retention of data and configuration would be good.</p>
<p>Any plans for a tape support. You currently have a very basic support for tape. Or, you would only be concentrating on D2D ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jaspreet</title>
		<link>http://blog.druva.com/2008/12/22/druvaa-insync-v30-feature-list/#comment-273</link>
		<dc:creator>Jaspreet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 06:27:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.druvaa.com/?p=73#comment-273</guid>
		<description>Borja,

Thanks for the comment and detailed explanation.

We are working on disk based archival/replication system to work with current PC backup or future server backup.

It would be a good idea to specify a different retention policy for the archival. For example it should be configurable to retain data older than 30 days for next 1 year.

Very soon, we would be announcing plans for a server backup offering as well.

Jaspreet</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Borja,</p>
<p>Thanks for the comment and detailed explanation.</p>
<p>We are working on disk based archival/replication system to work with current PC backup or future server backup.</p>
<p>It would be a good idea to specify a different retention policy for the archival. For example it should be configurable to retain data older than 30 days for next 1 year.</p>
<p>Very soon, we would be announcing plans for a server backup offering as well.</p>
<p>Jaspreet</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Borja</title>
		<link>http://blog.druva.com/2008/12/22/druvaa-insync-v30-feature-list/#comment-272</link>
		<dc:creator>Borja</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 21:14:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.druvaa.com/?p=73#comment-272</guid>
		<description>Restore-Point Archival Option:
Oposite to Restore-Point Deletion available today, Restore-Point Archival is a feature that will provide a Historycal Archive of customer&#039;s data providing at the same time an adequate ratio of storage amount used by the client.
The idea behind, beyond the amount of days restorepoints are kept in the server and that is defined at user-group level, is to be able to have a yearly, monthly or weekly single Restorepoint for backups over the provided default retention time.
Let&#039;s put an example of what could be achieved:
Retention policy is set up for 30 days.
Archival is configured for weekly+monthly+yearly
After 18 months the Restorepoints available would be:
- all the restorepoints of the last 30 days.
- 4 weekly restorepoints (1 per each previous 4 weeks to these 30 days)
- 12 montly restorepoints (1 per each previous 12 monts)
- 1 Yearly restorepoints.
So regardless the backup is performed every 20 minutes, with just 17 Restore-points extra the customer can get a good archival system.
This feature would be really appreciated I guess in Server Backups.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Restore-Point Archival Option:<br />
Oposite to Restore-Point Deletion available today, Restore-Point Archival is a feature that will provide a Historycal Archive of customer&#8217;s data providing at the same time an adequate ratio of storage amount used by the client.<br />
The idea behind, beyond the amount of days restorepoints are kept in the server and that is defined at user-group level, is to be able to have a yearly, monthly or weekly single Restorepoint for backups over the provided default retention time.<br />
Let&#8217;s put an example of what could be achieved:<br />
Retention policy is set up for 30 days.<br />
Archival is configured for weekly+monthly+yearly<br />
After 18 months the Restorepoints available would be:<br />
- all the restorepoints of the last 30 days.<br />
- 4 weekly restorepoints (1 per each previous 4 weeks to these 30 days)<br />
- 12 montly restorepoints (1 per each previous 12 monts)<br />
- 1 Yearly restorepoints.<br />
So regardless the backup is performed every 20 minutes, with just 17 Restore-points extra the customer can get a good archival system.<br />
This feature would be really appreciated I guess in Server Backups.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jaspreet</title>
		<link>http://blog.druva.com/2008/12/22/druvaa-insync-v30-feature-list/#comment-271</link>
		<dc:creator>Jaspreet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 08:53:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.druvaa.com/?p=73#comment-271</guid>
		<description>Borja,

Thanks for bringing this out.

We have some big plans for disaster recovery. You might see some good action on that front pretty soon.

Jaspreet</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Borja,</p>
<p>Thanks for bringing this out.</p>
<p>We have some big plans for disaster recovery. You might see some good action on that front pretty soon.</p>
<p>Jaspreet</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carlos</title>
		<link>http://blog.druva.com/2008/12/22/druvaa-insync-v30-feature-list/#comment-270</link>
		<dc:creator>Carlos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 08:49:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.druvaa.com/?p=73#comment-270</guid>
		<description>Dave/ Borja,

We consciously did not allow name based configurations.

Sometimes the internal host name matches to some other server over external link, and then it becomes very difficult to troubleshoot.

Lets see if there is an alternative to this and if we can support this in future.

Thanks for your comments.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dave/ Borja,</p>
<p>We consciously did not allow name based configurations.</p>
<p>Sometimes the internal host name matches to some other server over external link, and then it becomes very difficult to troubleshoot.</p>
<p>Lets see if there is an alternative to this and if we can support this in future.</p>
<p>Thanks for your comments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Borja</title>
		<link>http://blog.druva.com/2008/12/22/druvaa-insync-v30-feature-list/#comment-269</link>
		<dc:creator>Borja</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 08:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.druvaa.com/?p=73#comment-269</guid>
		<description>What about the inSync Server protection itself?.
I&#039;m missing an fully automated solution where the server itself is Automatically Backed-up to a remote location.
I don&#039;t think that NTBackup (Windows) or TAR (Linux) are good enough if at the end of the day someone needs to carry out a USB device or Tape off-site.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What about the inSync Server protection itself?.<br />
I&#8217;m missing an fully automated solution where the server itself is Automatically Backed-up to a remote location.<br />
I don&#8217;t think that NTBackup (Windows) or TAR (Linux) are good enough if at the end of the day someone needs to carry out a USB device or Tape off-site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

